Simon St.Laurent wrote,
> To put it another more amusing way, RDF is inhuman. XML at least
> tries to balance human and computer approaches to information. Then
> Namespaces in XML came along - oh, the humanity!
I'm obviously missing something, because of the ten design goals listed
at the the top of the XML REC only one, "XML documents should be
human-legible and reasonably clear", speaks to humanity. The bulk of
the remainder address automated processing and the needs of
programmers.
I think you've been seeing more human-friendliness than was ever really
intended to be there.
Cheers,
Miles
