james anderson wrote:
>"Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" wrote:
>
>
>>[remarks about the goal of a 1-1 relation between namespace name and schema, and thereby universal name and schema component.]
>>
>>
>
>this would be a mistake.
>
>just as it is important to let an application bind the behaviour associated with
>a name as late as possible, a generic document processor should able to bind as
>late as possible those aspects of the behaviour which it handles. which is when
>the document definition is interpreted, not when the name is parsed.
>
Having the document definition location information as the name does not
mandate a certain point of evaluating that information beyond the
semantics of a name.
Manos
