← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20]
How about turning something like this into a finding or NOTE or something: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html Joe defines "sanity" and then says: "QNames in content are a lot easier to process in a sane document. Sanity guarantees that a given QName means the same thing wherever it appears. Any future markup vocabulary which uses QNames in content should include sanity as an application requirement." That's a start. As the idea gains currency we could push towards a new version of the namespaces spec that encourages (and perhaps one day requires) sanity everywhere. -- Paul Prescod
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread