Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

From
Mike Champion <>
To
Date
2002-08-14T19:50:48Z
ID
<087PN85VLHUSC71UYWVUE0JTOJGSO.3d5ab498@MChamp>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
8/14/2002 3:32:39 PM, John Cowan <> wrote:

>
>Well, if you devised an SGML-with-default-concrete-syntax version of
>the ESIS, I should think it would look pretty much like this.

It was the Hobson's Choice between ESIS and Groves that drove me
screaming from SGML 5 years ago. :~)