That is a consensus of the uninformed, Ann.
That is how we get into these traps where
mutual self-referencing creates an illusion
of spec-based design. The question here is
simple: are these arc forms renamed and
slightly weakened such that what we end
up with is more complicated and less powerful?
len
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:]
At 04:19 PM 9/13/2002 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>I read this earlier and almost responded; it appears
>the WG is attemping a weak version of architectural
>forms.
>
>Is this another case of changing the names and adopting
>a piece of another technology (namespaces) that makes
>the result more complicated than the original and
>ends up being less powerful?
No, see XHTML Modularization conformance definitions,
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/conformance.html#s_conform .
These terms have been around for several years now (without argument from
the community).
The point of the message is the linking examples, not an ideological
argument about application construction.
