> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjun Ray [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:07 AM
> To:
>
> "Aaron Skonnard" <> wrote:
>
> | The implementation seems reasonable (ignoring the bug Dare pointed
> | out),
>
> But how can it be a bug? The implementors will probably tell
> you it's a feature. If needed, they might klonk you over the
> head with the word that slays all arguments: Performance!
It's hard to take your posts seriously when you make such incoherrent
statements. It's a bug. It's in our bug database. The person who sits in
the office across from mine who currently owns our XML parsers agrees
its a bug. The person who originally wrote the code agrees its a bug.
The person who designed the API agrees it's a bug.
Somehow we are all lying and you who have nothing to do with the design,
implementation or documentation of the API *knows* it is by design.
*sigh*
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Self-made people have an abundance of working parts.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
