Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping

From
Norman Walsh <>
To
Date
2002-09-30T16:33:53Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Eric van der Vlist <> was heard to say:
|> But that schemaLocation thing should have been a PI anyway. It doesn't
|> belong as an attribute value in my instance document, darn it.
|
| You said it first! 

And I'll say it again, if you like.

| Eric (convinced that PIs should be de-de-facto-deprecated)

Uh huh.

<stage-direction>norm don's flame-retardant underwear</stage-direction>

The only significant technical objection I recall hearing against PIs
was that they didn't have globally unique names. But if we allowed the
PI target to be a QName...

<stage-direction>norm exits, stage left, quickly</stage-direction>

:-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
    | As charms are nonsense, nonsense is a
XML Standards Architect | charm.--Benjamin Franklin
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9mHzxOyltUcwYWjsRAl3WAJ9zRRenovrqLh7qpEehakpnhjC9aACfVXWk
bu99jpUsMb+QZRCZG5wuuMc=
=7FcD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----