Tim Bray wrote:
> What really scares me is the recurring theme that we ought to re-frame XML
> as a data model and treat the syntax as just one
> serialization. That makes me seriously paranoid - if somebody promises me
> XML, I want a stream of unicode characters with angle-brackets, not some
> fragile opaque binary kludge which is advertised as having infoset
> semantics.
Granted. With rejoicing. Now how do we insure that we will get it? And not
just now, but for as long as our documents might have some use to someone?
