RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)

I'm not sure how the latter thread (ConciseXML) argues against direct
access. Adam Bosworth is arguing for better support for processing XML
in programming languages/APIs while Mike seems to be arguing for a
mechanism for serializing objects to markup. Both threads seem
complementary to me. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
A pipe gives a wise man time to think and a fool something to stick in
his mouth.                           

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:] 
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:22 PM
> To: 
> 
> I can't decide if this is some sort of strange good cop bad 
> cop marketing ploy. I thought I would point out the extreme 
> irony of these two threads appearing at the same time. One 
> argues for direct access while the other argues against it. 
> Either Mike and Walter are secretly in cahoots or the XML 
> Universe is caving in.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff Rafter
> Defined Systems
> http://www.defined.net
> XML Development and Developer Web Hosting
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
>