On Friday 17 January 2003 6:21 pm, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> In the ConciseXML version of the date attribute, the data is a string that
> has to be parsed, and you could just as well do the same in a reasonable
> XML version. There is no use in contriving stupid XML examples to make the
> comparison more favorable to ConciseXML.
This is marketing; all's fair in love, war, and marketing! I've seen many XML
proponents contriving stupid examples to try to prove the opposite point too,
we need more biased and unfair anti-XML comparisons to redress the balance
and try to undo the hype...
>
> Tom P
>
ABS
--
Oh, pilot of the storm who leaves no trace, Like thoughts inside a dream
Heed the path that led me to that place, Yellow desert screen
