Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many)
xml-dev · January 2003 · 6 messages · back to month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00659 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Paul Prescod | 2003-01-30 14:11 |
| 00663 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Mike Champion | 2003-01-30 15:14 |
| 00749 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Mark Baker | 2003-01-30 19:23 |
| 00736 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Mike Champion | 2003-01-30 20:16 |
| 00734 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Paul Prescod | 2003-01-30 22:50 |
| 00676 | Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) | Mike Champion | 2003-01-31 01:24 |