RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try)

 (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>I believe it would look like Tim Bray's XML-SW.

I wouldn't count on that, given the endless hours spent on largely
useless namespace discussions.  Given a chance to start clean, I'd hope
other pathways would be considered.  (And xml:base?  Geez.)

Not that anyone's likely to start clean, of course. 

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org