> This further says that W3C is politically motivated and is not a true
> standards body but one where commercial interests of the insiders are put
> ahead of the standards process -
Do you know of any standards organization where this isn't true?
> that one person
> says this publicly is all that it takes to invalidate the envelope of
> propriety around the W3C's operations and make the motivations behind all
> their efforts suspect.
Wow. Do the sanity and motivations of the accuser enter into it all?
/r$
