Re: [xml-dev] Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
XML Dev <>
Date
2003-03-30T20:07:49Z
ID
<r01050400-1024-4865D5B262EB11D7B1500003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
 writes:
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>> BEEP did a much nicer job with this stuff, using XML for both headers
>> and (sometimes) content, but keeping them in separate documents.
They
>> demonstrated that XML can useful for protocols work but that you
don't
>> need to confuse XML documents with messages.
>
>sort of like ebXML then? or any SOAP implementation with the payload
>separate from the envelope.

I believe so.  Separate payloads in SOAP still appear to be the
exception, not the rule.



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org