RE: [xml-dev] CDATA

Maybe the requirement is to support NDATA.  I get a lot 
of inquiries about stuffing jpegs, etc, inline.  When 
I show them the limited means, I get frowns.  Perhaps 
it is time to revisit that permathread.

len

From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:]

Another point for removing CDATA marked sections is that
many people expect "CDATA" really means "NDATA",
to allow them to stick in binary fragments (which may cause 
transcoding problems).