Re: [xml-dev] 3 possible approaches for representing concepts

Bill de h?ra scripsit:

> The main benefit of being able to express co-occurence constraints 
> in a schema language is not to be able say cool things with markup, 
> talk about the formal properties, or even point fingers at other 
> schema languages.

True.  But it *is* so much fun.

> It's the eliminatation of defensive code, which is 
> invariably brittle, error-prone and time consuming.

Hear, hear.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_