(Thomas B. Passin) writes:
>Yes, yes, but you don't gotta support the schema __authoring__
>capability in the low end versions, just the ability to use one if it
>shows up. That is more likely how schemas would be used at home and
>in small businesses anyway, I would think - someone comes up with a
>useful schema and lots of people want to use it.
Thinking back to Jon Bosak's keynote at XML 2002, UBL seems perfect for
that kind of application.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,825911,00.asp
Word does make a handy tool for reading orders and invoices, Access is
good for storing them, and Excel is good for analyzing them. They just
need a little bit of smarts.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
