Sounds like we need an XML vocabulary (XMaiL?) that can be used by a
listserv to describe the required (or preferred) properties of e-mail
interactions. These properties would override (if allowed by the user)
the properties that are set in the e-mail client.
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
(Sorry about the vCard signature:)
Joe English wrote:
>
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> > Uche Ogbuji writes:
> > >The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed
> > >flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does
> > >this rightly, regardless of other technical issues.
> >
> > And I agree with Uche on this point, adding that I wish more people
> > would trim the recipients list when they reply.
>
> +1.
>
> Also, if posters would reply To: the list (as Simon just did)
> instead of To: the sender and Cc: the list (as Uche just did),
> then "Reply to list" will have a better chance of working
> in most MUAs.
>
> (... and refrain from top-posting, sending HTML, using
> vCard signatures, etc., ... but that's a losing battle.)
>
> --Joe English
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
