Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?

"Simon St.Laurent" <> wrote:
|  (John Cowan) writes:

|>> There's no risk of data loss [from processing WordML], at least based 
|>> on the current (scant) information.
|>
|> That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is 
|> not.
| 
| Not well, perhaps, but it's hardly random.  I suspect it will keep a lot
| of people in business for a long time, with or without documentation.

Time to resurrect the Rainbow DTDs?