Re: [xml-dev] Ordinary (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd)

[Rick Jelliffe]
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <>

> There can still be validators - they just do not validate using ordinary
schemas.

Yes, and if the source code for these validators were released by the group
who
made the language being validated, with a warrant that it was (as far as it
went)
an correct realization of their standard, it would fill my criteria for a
schema
(from this standards-adoption QA POV), albeit an oddity (although perhaps
the IETF system works a little this way, with the standard being a
description
of the running code.)

[Tom P]

Yes, I was thinking of Reference Implementations with openly available code.

Chees,

Tom P