RE: Re: [xml-dev] Syntax + object model

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Date
2003-05-24T17:15:58Z
ID
<r01050400-1026-630DC4BC8E0B11D7AA160003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
Thread
RE: Re: [xml-dev] Syntax + object model
 (Linda Grimaldi) writes:
>I admire your single-mindedness and certainty about the universe- I
>just don't share it.  I'm working on a project now that might use an
>RDF-based ontology for a repository application, and, I think it just
>might work pretty neatly.

I have no certainty whatsoever about the universe.  I find onotologies
to be an approach to making claims of certainty about the universe, a
project I find unfortunate.  XML's sort-of-shared syntax is as far up
the chain of certainty as I find plausible.

>I am short- I hope this doesn't make me a troll...

No, the original claim was here:

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200305/msg00667.html

Was that a troll?  I don't know.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org