From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <>
>
> The assumption that RNA cannot be used inside of some other vocabulary
seems
> perhaps dangerous to me: on person's metadata is another persons data.
> Sooner or later someone will want to gobble up RNA and encapsulate it in
> some strange way. Perhaps if only to present a live RNA example on a Web
> page? Sure, in that case you can probably arrange for no collisions, but
> maybe someone will find a reason to do some kind of indirect/dynamic or
> recursive RNA (ack!) type thing and then what?
And then nothing. The whole purpose of the restrictions is to dissallow
such use. RNA does not have defined meaning when inside a document of
another vocabulary. If you encountered such a thing, it might _look like_
RNA, but it would not _be_ RNA.
---
Seairth Jacobs
