RE: [xml-dev] Does SAX make sense?

I don't know, Patrick, maybe I'm confused but the line you quoted:

>> Another advantage is that it operates with standard XML syntax,
>> unlike some proposals, such as LMNL, which has its own (non-XML)
format.

to me parses as "X operates with standard XML syntax, unlike Y", and so
I don't understand how you then say:

>> Did not make any claims about it not being able to operate with 
>> standard XML syntax

How did you not claim that? What am I missing here?

Paul Caton.