Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> Are any of the open source XSLT processors clean enough to be
> plausibly forked? The only one I've spent any time exploring (Saxon)
> gave me shivers, it was so convoluted.
Really? That wasn't my impression; I found the Saxon source
code to be quite well-organized and well-commented.
It's one of the few Java code bases I've seen that actually
has *useful* javadoc commentary.
I've gone spelunking in there a couple times (mostly out of
curiosity), and have generally been able to figure out what's
going on.
--Joe English
