Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question

[Linda Grimaldi]

> Doesn't a restriction apply to all members of a class?  What I am
> looking for will vary in value by instance, not by class.  And since
> instances will be added all the time, I can't subclass and lump
> together.
>

Yes - I thought that by using owl:allValuesFrom, you could restrict the
hasMappingClass to include only those transitive properties (or whatever)
you talked about.  I assumed that those properties would have a class of
their own, which would be the object of owl:allValuesFrom.

> Ah, for true ternary relations  :>).
>

Ah, for Topic Maps... :-)

Cheers,

Tom P