RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Rich Salz' <>
Date
2003-07-23T16:57:56Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Agree.  It translates to 'riskier' and that has to be 
asserted to the business that assumes the risk.  First 
in the chain are the insurance companies.  I believe 
that nails down this topic.

len

From: Rich Salz [mailto:]

> Because the risk is possible, not having
> covered it means the business model (not the software product)
> is not credible.

"not credible" is way too strong; perhaps "less credible"
	/r$