RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?

From
Dare Obasanjo <>
To
,
Date
2003-08-13T21:11:21Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
> -----Original Message-----
> From:  [mailto:] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: 
> Cc: 
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is 
> XML Really Extensible?
> 
> Mr. Snell proposes a solution to some tough problems that Mr. 
> Obasanjo thinks, if they are solved, would provide sufficient 
> grounds for successfully mixing arbitrary namespaces (that 
> is, provide the requisite semantics), and Mr. Bullard points 
> out that namespaces are being used to attach semantics to XML.  

Nope. Alaric proposes solutions to specific instances of the general
problem of mixing arbitrary XML vocabularies. I don't think solutions to
the general problem are feasible and definitely do not think any of the
current discussions even point in the right direction to solving such a
problem on a decentralized network like the WWW.  

Like I said I've bowed out of this thread, however I didn't want to
leave my position misrepresented. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.