At 3:28 PM -0400 8/14/03, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>Thinking more about the term "record-like" for what is commonly called
>"data-oriented" XML: One may run into some disagreement with the notion
>that "document-oriented" (or narrative) XML does not involve records (I
>am intentionally speaking very generally here). For example, given the
>recent Sarbanes-Oxley Act here in the U.S., every "type" of XML is
>expected to be record-oriented.
>
Could you elaborate on that point? That doesn't seem at all
self-evident to me. I'm not sure what you mean.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
