RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs

From
Dare Obasanjo <>
To
Brian Speight <>,
Date
2003-09-23T17:02:44Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Speight [mailto:] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: 
> Subject: [xml-dev] XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
> 
> All, 
> 
> I'm looking for advice on usage of nillable vs. minOccurs. 
> When you have an element that is optional should you use 
> "nillable=true" or "minOccurs=0" or both? Using both seems to 
> make things more complicated than necessary. 

I'd use minOccurs="0", nillable just complicates matters. For example,
an element can have xsi:nil="true" in the instance and still have all
its attributes.  

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Flashlight batteries never die in the daylight hours.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.