RE: [xml-dev] fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group

From
Jeff Lowery <>
To
'Eric van der Vlist' <>, Jeff Lowery <>
Date
2003-10-10T17:57:04Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group
> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:] 

> It's raising the bar on the expressiveness of the language 
> used to define the facets, but I think that, yes, it should 
> be easier. 

Hmmm. I wonder about incompatible formal systems (i.e., ones that are based
on different axioms): can we define enough facets for all? Seems intractable
to me, but maybe I'm missing the drift here.