On Jan 25, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Henrik Martensson wrote:
>> I have no qualms about exposing URLs. People are familiar with URLs,
>> and the notion of pointing to something using a URL is
>> well-understood.
>
> Agreed. (And thank you for writing "URL" and not "URI".)
Well, there's nothing wrong with using URL as long as you are clear
exactly what you mean. This is made a bit more difficult by the fact
that there's no normative definition which is still in effect, last
time I checked. I believe that what you mean is something like
"HTTP-scheme URIs which are normally dereferenceable unless something's
wrong." But since there is room for confusion, you should probably say
so explicitly. -Tim
