Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers

xml-dev · January 2004 · 12 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00559	Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bob Wyman	2004-01-15 19:41
00503	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Miles Sabin	2004-01-15 20:18
00560	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bill Kearney	2004-01-15 20:43
00547	RE: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bob Wyman	2004-01-15 21:01
00519	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Elliotte Rusty Harold	2004-01-15 21:59
00545	RE: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bob Wyman	2004-01-15 23:03
00526	RE: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Simon St.Laurent	2004-01-15 23:17
00473	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Michael Champion	2004-01-15 23:53
00635	RE: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Wendell Piez	2004-01-16 05:15
00579	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Dave Pawson	2004-01-16 16:57
00619	RE: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	2004-01-16 18:34
00596	Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers	Bill Kearney	2004-01-16 18:54