Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>>I found such a schema for XSLT 2.0, but not for XSLT 1.0. Even a
>>correct-as-far-as-it-goes unofficial one would probably be adequate for my
>>needs.
>
> Such a schema wouldn't be too-useful, as XSLT allows any result nodes and
> any global-scope elements (and their descendents) that belong to a non-XSLT
> namespace.
Yes but why wouldn't it be useful? Such a schema validates what it
specifically describes and validates that what it doesn't specifically
describe still operates within certain constrains.
Beyond validation, I know that editor users are quite happy to have
schema-driven assist/completion for XSLT elements and attributes, and
even some level of schema-driven assistance can be provided for non-XSLT
nodes, though they aren't always even locally valid. Not perfect, but
useful.
Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/
