RE: [xml-dev] Fun with regular expressions

Henry,

>Right -- the point is the erratum _removed_ the text which used to say
>that NaN was superbig.

Does that mean that the non-pattern approach to excluding NaN:

>>> maxInclusive of INF
>>> minInclusive of -INF

should actually NOT work in conforming processors?

.micah

-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Jeff Rafter
..snip..