RE: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!!
Thanks
for the help Bryce, I'll give that a whirl!
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryce K. Nielsen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 04 February 2004 16:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!!Assuming this is W3C's schema language, the first requirement to be in any position will be difficult. <xsd:sequence> doesn't allow this, <xsd:all> sorta does but there are restrictions. You can mock it by making everything in it's own optional sequence, such as <xsd:sequence minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='1'>, and that theoretically will work though some validators have struggled with this.The second requirement is a snap, just use minOccurs and maxOccurs. This I think will work for you:<!-- DISCLAIMER: Written on the fly, may have syntax errors --><xsd:element name="code"><xsd:complexType><!-- put the other elements in a different xsd:sequence node --><!-- this sequence (i.e. the party node) can now occur up to two times, if at all --><xsd:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="2"><xsd:element name="party"><xsd:complexType><xsd:sequence><xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string"/><xsd:element name="account" type="xsd:string"/></xsd:sequence></xsd:complexType></xsd:element></xsd:sequence></xsd:complexType></xsd:element>HTH,Bryce K. NielsenSysOnyx, Inc. (www.sysonyx.com)Makers of xmlArchitect, the Smart XML Schema Editor----- Original Message -----From: Rayner, ChrisSent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:59 AMSubject: [xml-dev] Problems with schema creation, help!!I have XML of a structure similar to this:
<code>
...
<party>
<name>blah</name>
<account>blah blah</account>
</party>
...
<party>
<name>deBlah</name>
<account>deBlah deBlah</account>
</party>
...
</code>and I need to build a schema that can enforce the following rules on the <party> element:
- <party> can be in any position under the <code> element
- <party> can occur either 0, 1 or 2 timesI wanted initially to use the all compositor but this will only allow 0 or 1 instances of <party> under <code>. Does any one have any insights into how this can be achieved?
Thanks!
Chris