Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <> was heard to say: | At 9:28 AM -0500 2/22/04, David Megginson wrote: | |>- add a feature to XMLReaderFactory, such as |> http://xml.org/sax/features/unicode-normalization-checking; most |> appropriate at the factory level (Norm Walsh, 2004-02-19); Jeff |> Rafter (2004-02-19) and Elliotte Rusty Harold (2004-02-19) disagree; |> Norm wants feature in factory so that factory can return different |> parsers (2004-02-20) | | It's not so much that I object to doing it on the factory, as that the | XMLReaderFactory has no setFeature/setProperty/getFeature/getProperty | methods. THerefore it's not possible within SAX as currently designed. | Perhaps we should add these methods to XMLReaderFactory. However, | that's a bigger change that should be considered on its own merits, | with a range of use cases, rather than being shoe-horned in to support | this one need. I doubt that could be reasonably pulled off in Norm's | time frame. Right. I concede that it'll have to be on the XMLReader and implementations will just have to deal with it. | I suspect Norm was thinking of adding this to SAXParserFactory, a No, I meant the XMLReaderFactory, but I had neglected to check that it had features. | hideous, evil monstrosity of a class that should be hung, shot, | beheaded, drawn and quartered, burned at the stake, buried in | unconsecrated ground, dug up, cremated, and the ashes tossed in the | Tiber while the complete cast of Wicked sings "Ding dong, the witch is | dead." Go on, tell us how you really feel. So you'd be discouraging the EG from adding the feature to the SAXParserFactory, then? :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <> | Words--so innocent and powerless they http://nwalsh.com/ | are, as standing in a dictionary, how | potent for good and evil they become, | in the hands of one who knows how to | use them!--Nathaniel Hawthorne
Next in thread →
Next in month →