At 2:56 PM +0000 2/2/04, Robin LaFontaine wrote:
>That makes sense, and is nice and simple. I had imagined these tools
>were more advanced! I guess this means not many people are using
>canonicalizers commercially.
I think most of the work has gone into generating and verifying
digital signatures without stopping in the middle to check the
canonical XML on its own.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
