Bob Foster wrote:
> Where did the "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" URI come from? The
> Namespaces In XML spec specifically says: "The prefix xmlns is used only
> for namespace bindings and is not itself bound to any namespace name."
> Am I missing some errata, or is there some complexity-multiplying going
> on here? It sure seems like a SAX feature that should be dropped should
> not be used to justify contradicting the namespaces recommendation.
Dereference http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/ for some clues.
Mike
