RE: [xml-dev] Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong

From
Rich Salz <>
To
Paul Sumner Downey <>
Date
2004-03-15T12:27:47Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
> Heh, and given canonicalisation is one of the simplest components of
> encrypting and signing XML, when can we expect to have *interoperable* WSS
> (WS-Security) implementations ?

I disagree with the premise.  Having done a couple of DSIG and XENC
implementations, the C14N part is usually among the hardest.
	/r$
--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html