Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd)

David Megginson <> writes:

> I'd say forget about classes and make your objects big bags of properties (attributes and relationships).

>   There exists an entity A.
>   A is human.
>   A is male.
>   A is married to B.
>   A is a biological parent of C.

Ahh... Imagine what that would do to the Prolog-101 canMarry(A,B)

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.