Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list available

Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
> +1. "compact" has clearer semantics than "optimised" if the main idea is 
> to optimise for space. -Mike

But as it happens that's not the case. Either way, right now it's just 
my terminology, not the WG's. Suggestions are of course welcome, even 
though if in the end all we disagree on is how to name it I'll call it 
success ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon