← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] ADMINISTRIVIA: Re: [xml-dev] Toward an controlled v ocabulary for "XML" and related terms? - was Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Cha racterization WG public list availabl e

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Michael Champion' <>
Date
2004-04-12T18:01:26Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] ADMINISTRIVIA: Re: [xml-dev] Toward an controlled v ocabulary for "XML" and related terms? - was Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Cha racterization WG public list availabl e
FutureBrowsers.com:  When the speed of light just ain't fast enough.

:-)

I use XML documents/instances, XML application languages, and 
XML systems as my upper level ontology for a controlled vocabulary. 
In this, the binary/optimizedThingie is not XML, but it can be 
used among consenting XML systems.  I don't use XML to mean everything 
that can work with an XML system.

In other words, it can't require XML to change to meet its requirements 
because that perturbates a lot of systems that may not want it.  It 
can have its own requirements.  Interop might be one of them.

len


From: Michael Champion [mailto:]


Sorry for the duplicate content ... I sent this yesterday, never saw 
it, and figured it was lost forever, and recyled some of it in my reply 
to another message.  24 hours later it shows up ....
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →