Re: [xml-dev] Wellformed?

From
<>
To
Jeff Rafter <>
Date
2004-05-25T08:42:53Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Wellformed?
RXP [1] agrees that the first is well-formed and namespace-conformant but
not valid, the second is well-formed but not namespace-conformant or
valid, and the third is valid and namespace-conformant.

ht

[1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~richard/rxp.html
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: 
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]