Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

From
Elliotte Harold <>
To
"Hunsberger, Peter" <>
Date
2004-10-26T14:32:20Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:


> I don't get the distinction.  As soon as you've got a graph you've got a
> tree (or perhaps many trees).
> 

Not necessarily. All trees are graphs but not all graphs are trees. For 
instance a pure tree can't represent a cycle but a graph can. XML's rule 
that a node can only have one parent is not a limit of graphs in general.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim