Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

From
Karl Waclawek <>
To
Date
2005-02-04T16:35:59Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
Toni Uusitalo wrote:

> 
> The following document is well-formed (and valid too but that's not the 
> point) but very troublesome to parse for MSXML (IE6 crashes) and Expat. 
> Works ok with RXP and Parsifal - haven't test others.

Worked fine with current Expat.

Karl