Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

From
Norman Walsh <>
To
Robert Koberg <>
Date
2005-02-08T18:43:26Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
/ Robert Koberg <> was heard to say:
| Amelia A Lewis wrote:
|
|> Almost all of this has to do with authoring, for folks who actually don't
|> mind (or even like, frightening as that may be) pointy brackets and
|> ampersands.  If you're pipelining it and running it through all sorts of
|> cool transformations and in general ignoring the folks who *like* editing
|> XML in text editors, then entities very likely do "blow."
|
| Do you think the future of /XML/
| editing is going to be done in text
| editors?

Yes.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <> | Endurance is frequently a form of
http://nwalsh.com/            | indecision.--Elizabeth Bibesco