RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")

From
Michael Kay <>
To
'Prakash Yamuna' <>, 'Dare Obasanjo' <>,
Date
2005-02-19T00:08:33
ID
<>
Thread
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
> But I always end up with a feeling that there must be
> better way for things to evolve. The current approach
> of "CAN'T TOUCH INTERFACES" - is I feel flawed - how
> do you evolve in such an environment?

I find it surprising that one can't add a method to an interface with a
default implementation, making it more like an abstract class but still
allowing multiple inheritance.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/