On May 18, 2005, at 20:19, Michael Kay wrote:
> By contrast, XML Spy uses its own schema processor, which is not
> always 100% conformant with the spec.
Has anyone systematically surveyed the conformance of various XSD
validator implementations? Is there a comparison table somewhere on the
Web?
I have often seen--as in this thread--various qualifications suggesting
that a particular implementation is not 100% conformant or is partial,
etc. Xerces claims fullness but I've been told it doesn't implement the
latest errata.
--
Henri Sivonen
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
