On May 6, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Richard Tobin wrote:
> I don't see the contradiction - maybe you misunderstood me. I didn't
> mean that an XML editor doesn't use an XML document, I meant it doesn't
> use it *for its semantics*.
I'm probably being thick.. but I don't understand this. That's probably
because I think *semantics* are entirely in the eye of the beholder.
It seems to be that *some* editors might understand *all* of the
semantics of XML (as I believe you mean it), but augment them with
constraints/semantics above and beyond those?
