RE: [xml-dev] Interesting pair of comments (was Re: [xml-dev] Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)

> Data binding tools use schemas for type information so you could say they
> use them for PSVI [in a way] but not validation. Many of the interop
> problems are of the form "my tool can bind to schemas with construct X
> while my business partner's can't". A real world example of this is trying
> to send nillable types back and forth between Java and .NET XML Web
> Service toolkits.

It is a funny question isn't it:  can you have a PSVI when you have not
validated?

It's in the lax/strict ballpark I guess...you decide a priori that the
document is valid. Is that the distinguishing feature that needs to be
accommodated?  No Schema Validation Infoset (NSVI)?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe